An enterprise resource planning (ERP) system is a set of business applications that are integrated to provide support for core business process activities. Core business process activities may include actions around manufacturing production, logistics, sales, marketing, finance, accounting, human resources, and others. Implementation of an ERP system aids the organizational units in sharing data and knowledge, reducing costs, and improving management of the business processes. Yet, ERP implementations still fail.
Address the following requirements:
· Describe why change management is important to ERP implementation.
· Describe why individuals in an organization may resist change and offer at least three strategies for overcoming resistance.
· Share an example of a successful or unsuccessful ERP implementation at an organization of your choosing.
· Describe why it was successful or not.
Embed course material concepts, principles, and theories, which require supporting citations along with at least two scholarly, peer-reviewed references in supporting your answer.
Required:
Chapters 11, 12, & 13 in Operations Management
Chapter 11 PowerPoint slides Click for more options Module 13 Chapter 11 PowerPoint slides - Alternative Formats – Operations Management
Chapter 12 PowerPoint slides Click for more options Module 13 Chapter 12 PowerPoint slides - Alternative Formats – Operations Management
Chapter 13 PowerPoint slides Click for more options Module 13 Chapter 13 PowerPoint slides - Alternative Formats – Operations Management
Ping Lin. (2019). Design and implementation of financial accounting information management system of shipping companies based on ERP. Journal of Coastal Research, 94, 470–474.
Wissam El, H., & Ali, S. (2019). Study on the factors that determine the success of ERP implementation. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 13(1), 298-312.
Recommended:
Saxena, D., & McDonagh, J. (2019). Evaluating ERP implementations: The case for a lifecycle-based interpretive approach. Electronic Journal of Information Systems Evaluation, 22(1), 29–37.
0 comments:
Post a Comment