Week
5: Discussion on Confidentiality/Information Security/HIPAA
Participation Requirement: You are required to post a minimum of
three (3) times in each discussion. These three (3) posts must be on a minimum
of two (2) separate days. You must respond to the initial discussion question
by 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday. On additional days, respond to your peers’
posts as well as additional faculty posts. Responses to peers must be posted by
11:59 p.m. on Sunday each week a discussion is due.
Step 1: Read the following article entitled, “The
Beginner HIPAA Professionals Guide to the Electronic Health Information
Considerations” (Attached to discussion)
Step 2: View the following videos,
“What is HIPAA?” https://www.prohipaa.com/training/video/what-is-hipaa (Links to an external site.)
“HIPAA Training: The
HIPAA Privacy Rule”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y751i4QqP0g (Links to an external site.)
“Confidentiality:
HIPAA Regulations”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8tnGvV9nc4 (Links to an external site.)
“How to Maintain
Patient Confidentiality”https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APs23yxH5zc (Links to an external site.)
Step 3: Visit the U.S. Department of Health
& Human Services website for additional information regarding HIPAA
at https://www.hhs.gov/hipaa/for-professionals/privacy/index.html (Links to an external site.)
Confidentiality is the right to privacy with respect to one’s
personal medical information. The Health Insurance Portability Accountability
Act (HIPAA) was established in 1996.
·
HIPAA is a uniform,
federal act providing protection for health consumers
·
State laws that may
provide additional protections to consumers are not affected by HIPAA
·
HIPAA guarantees that
clients are able to access their medical records
·
HIPAA provides clients
with control over how their personal health information is used and disclosed
·
HIPAA outlines limited
circumstances in which personal health information can be disclosed without
first obtaining consent of the client of the client’s family. They include:
oSuspicion
of child or elder abuse
oWhen
otherwise required by law such as suspicion of criminal activity
oIncidences
of state agency of health department requirements; reportable communicable
diseases
Initial Discussion Scenario:
Jenna Peterson, a 20-year-old college student, made an
appointment to be seen by Susan Grant, M.D. Jenna had been seeing Dr. Grant for
a few years. Dr. Grant was also the long-time family practitioner for Jenna’s
mom and older sister.
On this visit, Jenna said she would like to get a prescription
for birth control pills. They discussed other contraception options, as well as
the risk and benefits of each and decided that “the pill” would be Jenna’s best
option. After reviewing Jenna’s medical history and performing a brief physical
examination, Dr. Grant gave Jenna a six-month prescription for Ortho-Novum
10/11, along with educational materials on oral contraceptives. She told her to
schedule a six-month follow-up appointment over summer break.
When Jenna checked out with the front office, she told the
billing office that she did NOT want this visit submitted to her mother’s
insurance. Instead, she would pay for the visit herself because she didn’t want
her mother to know the reason for the visit. The billing clerk said that she
would send Jenna a bill because the practice’s billing system was undergoing a
software upgrade. Jenna asked that the bill be sent to her college address.
About two weeks later, Mrs. Peterson had a routine appointment
with Dr. Grant. When she checked in, she stopped by the billing office and
asked the insurance clerk to check a notice of claim statement she recently
received from her insurance carrier about a visit by Jenna. Mrs. Peterson said,
“I know Jenna hasn’t been here because she’s away at school.” The clerk said
she’d check on the claim and should have information for Mrs. Peterson by the
time she was done seeing Dr. Grant. Mrs. Peterson was then taken back to an
exam room for her appointment.
While seeing Mrs. Peterson, Dr. Grant inquired about the
Peterson family and mentioned that “Jenna has really blossomed into a
beautiful, intelligent young woman.” Mrs. Peterson thanked Dr. Grant and asked,
“When did you see Jenna?” Dr. Grant unthinkingly said, “Oh, a couple weeks ago
when she was in for her appointment.” When Mrs. Peterson questioned why Jenna
had been seen, Dr. Grant realized she had said too much. She hemmed and hawed a
bit, and finally suggested that Mrs. Peterson talk to Jenna.
Despite Mrs. Peterson’s insistence that she had a right to know
why Jenna was seen, Dr. Grant refused to provide additional details. Mrs.
Peterson was clearly angry with that response and stormed out of the exam room.
On her way out, she stopped at the billing office, and the insurance clerk
confirmed that Jenna was in for an appointment on the day in question and that
the claim was correct.
Assignment: Discuss your responses to the following
questions in your posting?
1.
Was Jenna’s right to
privacy violated by Dr. Grant and the billing office?
2.
Once Mrs. Peterson was
informed of her daughter’s visit, did she have the right to know the reason for
her daughter’s visit?
3.
Does Jenna have the
right to sue for breach of confidentiality? Does Mrs. Peterson have a right to
sue for failure to disclose information for a visit that her insurance company
paid for?
4.
What risk management
recommendations would you give to this organization to prevent future
violations?
0 comments:
Post a Comment