answer THE FOLLOWING QUESTION 100-200 WORDS IN TOTAL
What have you liked or disliked about peer critiquing in the past? What makes a good peer critique and what makes a bad peer critique?
How do you approach the peer critique process? (i.e. Do you focus more on small things like grammar and spelling? Or do you look at the big picture to figure out if the document fulfills its purpose? Maybe you look to see if the paper has a good flow and follows the prompt? These are just examples.)
What is one piece of advice you would give to your classmates about how to be a good peer editor
What do you hope to get from your peer editors in this class?
0 comments:
Post a Comment