Kelly's "Introduction" to Essays
I would like you to respond generally to Kelly's "Introduction" to Essays. You might respond to one of the following questions, or a question of your own about the text, but remember to focus on the text and demonstrate your familiarity with it.
What does Kelly suggest is the purpose of an argument? Kelly lists three kinds of argument: Logical, Ethical, and Pathetic.
Which does he seem to claim is the better approach? Do you agree? Why or why not? How would you explain what rhetoric is in your own words?
I would like you to respond generally to Kelly's "Introduction" to Essays. You might respond to one of the following questions, or a question of your own about the text, but remember to focus on the text and demonstrate your familiarity with it.
What does Kelly suggest is the purpose of an argument? Kelly lists three kinds of argument: Logical, Ethical, and Pathetic.
Which does he seem to claim is the better approach? Do you agree? Why or why not? How would you explain what rhetoric is in your own words?
0 comments:
Post a Comment