Critical Thinking and Reflection Journal entry supports claims

Critical Thinking and Reflection Journal entry supports claims



Journal entry supports claims with relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process

(23-25)

Journal entry supports claims with mostly relevant examples of personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process

(20-22)

Journal entry supports claims with a somewhat relevant personal experience, previous learning, or logical thought process

(18-19)

Journal entry does not support claims with reflection on relevant personal examples





(0-17)

25

Integration and Application



Journal entry shows excellent depth of knowledge of the module content and exhibit careful consideration of the topic

(23-25)

Journal entry shows good depth of knowledge of the module content and demonstrate that the student has read the module content

(20-22)

Journal entry shows limited depth of knowledge, indicating the student may have reviewed the module content but needs to explore further

(18-19)

Journal entry does not address the prompts, and reflects that the student has not read the module content



(0-17)

25

Voice

Journal entry is written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience and a consistent voice is evident throughout

(23-25)

Journal entry is written in a style that is generally appropriate for the intended audience and an attempt is made to use a consistent voice

(20-22)

Journal entry is written in a style that considers the audience, but the author’s voice is not consistent and is difficult to identify

(18-19)

Journal entry does not attempt to use a style that considers audience, and there is no evidence of author voice



(0-17)

25

Writing

Journal entry is free of errors in organization and grammar





(23-25)

Journal entry is mostly free of errors of organization and grammar; errors are marginal and rarely interrupt the flow

(20-22)

Journal entries contain errors of organization and grammar, but these are limited enough so that entries can be understood

(18-19)

Journal entry contains errors of organization and grammar making the entry difficult to understand

(0-17)

25

Earned Total

Comments:

100%
Consider the following scenario: A private school utilizes a measure with well-established predictive validity for admissions. However, members of a particular group tend to score low on this test and are consequently denied admission. Considering your knowledge from the module content, what are your thoughts related to the continued use of this test?