NATO and Libya

You are required to write a short paper of 3000 words. The paper should critically discuss the academic debate over studying International Law and Organisations, a specific case study, or any other topic related to the course. The paper should answer three key questions:
1. How have scholars studied the topic? “NATO and Libya”
2. Do you agree or disagree with their explanations? NATO failed to move the country to a saver and better situation.
3. And Why? List at least 5 reasons
The topic of your paper should be discussed and approved by the instructor.
The papers should be focused, analytical and well-documented. They should avoid jargon and to be written in an academic language. In-text citation should follow Author-Date style (i.e. Larsen 2000: 24). Bibliography/references should follow Chicago Manuel of Style which can be checked at this link https://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide.html.
Title of the Paper:
NATO and Libya
Summary:
North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) operations in Libya were a matter of disputes at all levels four years ago. Since then, many of reports have been issued trying to address and analyse the nature of such intervention by NATO. Un clarity and ambiguity of Libyan future in that time, after Colonel Muammar Al-Gaddafi era in the country, had make the situation more complicated. UN 1973 resolution against the Muammar Al-Gaddafi regime in 2011 in order to save the civilians from the threat of the colonel government. NATO began the air strikes and Muammar Al-Gaddafi has been killed in a tragedy scenario in 2011 but up to date, the Libyans are suffering and the conflicts have not been solved. Number of jihadist groups such as ISIS are starting their operations on the ground and making the country in a tough condition. Because of that many politicians and researchers are debating that, to what extend was the NATO intervention in Libya successfully shifting the country to a safer situation.
This paper is going to cover number of points. Starting from "NATO and its mission in conflict zones" to "Libyan crises in 2011", followed by "NATO operations in Libya". Then, the paper will analyse the "legality of NATO intervention in this crises". After that, the paper will provide macro view of the country after the NATO. Finally, it will cover the lessons which have been taken from the Libyan crises.
Main Points to be listed, discussed and analysed in the Paper:
• NATO and its mission in Conflict Zones
Give an introduction about NATO interventions and operations in the conflicts area around the world, their missions, with an examples of Kosovo (Kosovo and NATO) and Afghanistan (Afghanistan and NATO) and to what extent NATO operations there have been succeeded. Very important to talk about UN and International law regarding such interventions.
• Libya Crises in 2011
Analyse the mentioned crises from where and when it start in 2011. Mention what called Arab spring. Also mention the nature of Libyans/ civilians requirements from Libyan government in that time. And why they were protest against ‘Muammar Al-Gaddafi’. No of civilians have been killed and injured in this crises. Analyse the situation and what could be the right way to solve the crises internally without any external interventions.